Estimation the Fatigue Number of Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixtures Modified with Nano SiO2 and Nano TiO2

Document Type: Regular Paper


1 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

2 Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.


Asphalt modification/reinforcement has received considerable attention as viable solutions to enhance flexible pavement performance. This is mainly prompted by the unsatisfactory performance of traditional road materials exposed to dramatic increases and changes in traffic patterns. This paper presents the evaluation of fatigue behaviour of nano reinforced Stone Mastic Asphalt mixtures. Fatigue is one of the most important distresses in asphalt pavement structure due to repeated load of heavy traffic services which occur at intermediate temperatures. There are different test methods used throughout the world to measure fatigue resistance for asphalt concrete mixtures. In this study, indirect tensile fatigue test was conducted to estimate fatigue number of asphalt mixture with different contents of nano SiO2 and Nano TiO2. The results indicated that the addition of different percentages of nano particles is capable to improve the shear modulus of modified bitumen. Also, modified SMA mixtures had more resistance against fatigue cracking phenomena.


Main Subjects

[1] Moghaddam, T.B., Karim, M.R., and Mahrez, A. (2011). “A review on fatigue and rutting performance of asphalt mixes”, Scientific Research and Essays, Vol. 6(4), pp. 670-682.

[2] Arabani, M., Jamshidi, R., Sadeghnejad, M. (2014). “Using of 2D finite element modeling to predict the glasphalt mixture rutting behavior”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 68, pp. 183-191.

[3] Ghasemi, M., Marandi, S.M., Tahmooresi, M., Kamali, J., and Taherzade, R. (2011).  “Modification of Stone Matrix Asphalt with Nano-SiO2”, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 1(1), pp. 1338-1344.

[4] Brown, E., Hemant, M. (1993). “Evaluation of Laboratory propertiesof SMA mixture”, Tech. Rep. 93-5, National Center forAsphalt Technology, Auburn University.

[5] Ratnasamy, M., Bujang, B. (2006). “Laboratory diameteral fatigue performance of SMA with cellulose oil palm fiber”, AmericanJournal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 3(9), pp. 2005–2010.

[6] Modarres, A., Hamedi, H. (2014). “Effect of waste plastic bottles on the stiffness and fatigue properties of modified asphalt mixes”, Materials and Design, Vol. 61, pp. 8–15.

[7] Moghadasnejad, F., Azarhoosh, A., Hamedi, G.H. (2014). “Effect of high density polyethylene on the fatigue and rutting performance of hot mix asphalt– a laboratory study”, Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 15, pp. 746-756.

[8] Suchismita, A., Panda, M., Chattaraj, U., Gaspar, L. (2011). “Fatigue Characteristics of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixes in Warm Climate”, Acta Technica Jaurinensis Vol. 4(3), pp. 123-129.

[9] Xiao, F., Zhao, P., Amirkhanian, S.N. (2009). “Fatigue behavior of rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures containing warm asphalt additives”, Construction and Building Materials, 23, p.p. 3144-3151.

[10] Shafabakhsh, G.H., Mirabdolazi, S.M., Sadeghnejad, M. (2014). “Evaluation the effect of nano-TiO2 on the rutting and fatigue behavior of asphalt mixtures”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 54, pp. 566–571.

[11] Jahromi, S., Khodaii, A. (2008). “Carbon fiber reinforced asphalt concrete”, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 33, pp. 355–64.

[12] Iran Highway Asphalt Paving Code, No. 234, 2011.

[13] Mashaan, N., Asim, H., Koting, S, and Karim, M. (2013). “Performance Evaluation of Crumb Rubber Modified Stone Mastic Asphalt Pavement in Malaysia”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, pp. 25-32.

[14] Ghaffarpour, S., Ahmadi, N. (2011). “Engineering Properties of Nanoclay Modified Asphalt Concrete Mixtures”, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 4(6), pp. 941–944.

[15] Yan, J., Ni, F., Yang, M., and Li, J. (2010). “An experimental study on fatigue properties of emulsion and foam cold recycled mixes”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, pp. 2151–2156.