Evaluating the Performance of the Buckling Restrained Braces in Tall Buildings with peripherally braced frames

Document Type: Regular Paper


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 2. M.Sc. graduated student of Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran


In recent years, seismic design of structures has been undergoing significant changes due to increasing demand for optimization and minimizing the level of damage and reducing the cost of structural repairs. Development of analytical methods and remarkable improvements of computer performance have been among the factors which influenced the design of structures. A lot of research has been conducted on the development of braces with perfect elastoplastic behaviour. The invention and development of the buckling restrained braces have been the results of these researches. In this study, the performance of the Buckling Restrained Environmental Braces (BRB) in high-rise buildings were evaluated using nonlinear time-history dynamics analysis with three pairs of acceleration and compared with the conventional concentrically braced frame (CBF). The studied structures are 20, 40, and 60 stories building in which braces were utilized peripherally. The obtained results illustrate that the use of Buckling Restrained Brace Frames (BRB) instead of conventional braces frame (CBF) in high-rise steel buildings improves hysteresis behavior of the braces and reduces lateral displacements and also increase the capacity of base shear.


Main Subjects

[1] Rai, D.C., Goel, S.C. (2003).  Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 59: 971-994.

[2] Roeder, C.W., Lumpkin, E.J., and Lehman, D.E. (2011). Balanced Design Procedure for Special Concentrically Braced Frame Connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research (Elsevier), 67(11): 1760-72.

[3] Yang, C.S., Leon, R.T., DesRoches R. (2008). Design and behavior of zipper braced frames, Engineering Structures, 30: 1092-1100.

[4] Yang, C.S., Leon, R.T., DesRoches R. (2008). Pushover response of a braced frame with suspended zipper struts, Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 134(10):1619-1626.

[5] Nouri, G.R., Kalesar, H.I., Ameli, Z. (2009). The applicability of the zipper strut to seismic rehabilitation of steel structures, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 58: 402-405.

[6] Naeim F. (2002). The Seismic Design Handbook, Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

[7] Aristizabal-Ochoa J. D. (1986). Disposable knee bracing: improvement in seismic design of steel frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, 112: 1544–1552.

[8] Constantinou, M. C., Tsopelas, P., Hammel, W., and Sigaher, A. N. (2001). Toggle-brace-damper seismic energy dissipation systems, J.Struct. Eng., 127(2): 105–112.

[9] Ibrahim, Y. E., Marshall, J., and Charney, F. A. (2007). Avisco-plastic device for seismic protection of structures, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63: 1515-1528.

[10] Hanson, R. D. and Soong, T. T. (2001). Seismic design with supplemental energy dissipation devices.  Earthquake Engineering Research Institute,Oakland, C.A., USA

[11] Bazzaz M., Andalib Z., Kheyroddin A. and Kafi M.A. (2015). Numerical Comparison of the Seismic Performance of Steel Rings in Off-centre Bracing System and Diagonal Bracing System, Journal of Steel and Composite Structures, 19(4): 917-937.

[12] Bazzaz M., Andalib Z., Kafi M.A. and Kheyroddin A. (2015). Evaluating the Performance of OBS-C-O in Steel Frames under Monotonic Load, Journal of Earthquakes and Structures, 8(3): 697-710.


[13] Andalib Z., Kafi M.A., Kheyroddin A. and Bazzaz M. (2014). Experimental Investigation of the Ductility and Performance of Steel Rings Constructed from Plates, Journal of Constructional steel research, 103:77-88.

[14] Bazzaz M., Kheyroddin A., Kafi M.A., Andalib Z. and Esmaeili H. (2014). Seismic Performance of Off-centre Braced Frame with Circular Element in Optimum Place, International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(2): 293-304.

[15] Wada A., and at el, Development of unbounded brace, Structural Research Center, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan.

[16] Wada, A., Huang, Y.H. and Iwata, M. (1999). Passive damping technology for buildings in Japan, Progress in Structure Engineering and Material, 2:1-15

[17] Berkeley, C. A., Dutta, A., and Hamburger, R. O. (2011). Case Study of a 40-Storey Buckling-Restrained Braced Frame Building Located in Los Angeles, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Building (Wiley InterScience), 19: 77-93

[18] Merritt, S., Uang, Ch. M., Benzoni, G. (2003). Subassemblage testing of Star Seismic buckling-restrained braces, Test report, University of California, San Diego.

[19] Newell, J., Uang, Ch.M., Benzoni, G. (2006). Subassemblage Testing of Corebrace Buckling-Restrained Braces (G-Series). Test Report, University of California, San Diego.

[20] Dunai L. (2011). Type testing of Buckling Restrained Braces according to EN 15129 – EWC800 – Final report.

[21] Kim, J., Park, J., Shin, S.W., & Min, K.W. (2009). Seismic Performance of Tubular Structures with Buckling Restrained Braces; The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. Vol. 18, pp: 351-370.

[22] Shadiya, K.P., & Anjusha, R. (2015). Bracing Configurations Effect on Buckling Restrained Braced Frames, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 4.

[23] Eletrabi, H., & Marshall, J.D. (2015). Catenary action in steel framed buildings with buckling restrained braces, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 113, pp: 221–233.

[24] Bazaez, R., & Dusicka, P. (2016). Cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete bridge bent retrofitted with buckling restrained braces”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 119, pp: 34–48.

[25] Hosseinzadeh, Sh., Mohebi, B. (2016). Seismic evaluation of all steel buckling restrained braces using finite element analysis”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 119, pp: 76-84

[26] Khan, F. R., H. Iyengar, J. P. Colaco, (1966). Complete Design of the100-story John Hancock Centre” ASCE Journal of the Structural Davison, ST6, December, pp: 55-73

[27] ANSI/AISC360-10. (2005). American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC) Specification Structural Steel Buildings Chicago: American Institute for Steel Construction.

[28] PERFORM-3D. (2006). PERFORM-3D Nonlinear Analysis and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures: Computers and Structures, Inc. University Avenue Berkeley, California.

[29] FEMA356. (2000). FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA 356) Prestandard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Virginia.

[30] Pan, T.C., Brownjohn, J.M.W., You, X.T. (2004). Correlating Measured and Simulated Dynamic Responses of a Tall Building to Long-Distance Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 33, pp: 611-632.

[31] ASCE/SEI41-13. (2014). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE/SEI 41-13) Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. United States of America: American Society of Civil Engineers.