Effect of Type and Distribution of Shear Studs on the Behavior of Composite Steel-Concrete Shear Walls

Document Type: Regular Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Faculty of civil engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran


In this research the in-plane shear behavior of composite steel-concrete shear walls was investigated by taking into account the following variables: steel plate thickness, the spacing between shear studs, the shape and type of the shear studs and consideration of the minimum reinforcement in the wall section. Several finite element models were analyzed and numerical results of two models were verified with available experimental results in the literature. Results revealed that increasing the thickness of the steel plate increases the yield and ultimate shear strengths; moreover, increasing the spacing between shear studs reduces the shear resistance to some extent; furthermore, steel-plate composite (SC) walls with iron angles have higher yield and ultimate shear resistance than walls with studs; finally, the wall with the minimum reinforcement behaved better than the wall with no reinforcement in terms of ductility and shear strength.


Main Subjects

[1] Shen, J., Seker, O., Akbas, B., Seker, P., Momenzadeh, S., & Faytarouni, M., 2017. Seismic performance of concentrically braced frames with and without brace buckling. Engineering Structures141, 461-481.
[2] Momenzadeh, S., Seker, O., Faytarouni, M., & Shen, J., 2017. Seismic performance of all-steel buckling-controlled braces with various cross-sections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research139, 44-61.
[3] Momenzadeh, S., Kazemi, M. T., & Asl, M. H., 2017. Seismic performance of reduced web section moment connections. International Journal of Steel Structures17(2), 413-425.
[4] Bazzaz, M., Kafi, M. A., Kheyroddin, A., Andalib, Z., & Esmaeili, H., 2014. Evaluating the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with circular element in optimum place. International Journal of Steel Structures14(2), 293-304.
[5] Usami, S., Akiyama, H., Narikawa, M., Hara, K., Takeuchi, M.,Sasaki, N., 1995, Study on a concrete filled steel structure for nuclear power plants (part 2). Compressive loading tests on wall members, SMIRT 13, Porto Alegre , Brazil,August,pp.21-26.
[6]Takeda,T.,Ymaguchi,T.,Nakamaya,T.,Akiyama,k.,Kato, Y.,1995, Experimental study on shear characteristics of a concrete filled steel plate wall, SMIRT 13, Porto Alegre , Brazil,August 1995, pp.3-14.
[7] Ozaki, M., Akita, S., Osuga, H., Nakayama, T., Adachi, N, 2004. Study on Steel Plate Reinforced Concrete Panels Subjected to Cyclic in-Plane Shear, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 228, pp. 225-244.
[8] Sasaki, N., Akiyama, H., Narikawa, M., Hara, K., Takeuchi, M., Usami, S., 1995, Study on a concrete filled steel structure for nuclear power plants (part 3). Shear and bending loading tests on wall members, SMiRT13, Porto Alegre , Brazil,August,pp.27-32.
[9] Emori, K., 2002, Compressive and shear strength of concrete filled steel box wall, Steel structures 2, 29-40.
[10] Amit H. Varma .et al.2011.In plane shear behavior of SC composite walls: Theory vs. Experiment.  Transactions, SMIRT 21, 6-11 November, New Delhi, India
[11] Amit H. Varma .et al.2011.Out of plane shear behavior of SC composite structures.  Transactions, SMiRT 21, 6-11 November, New Delhi, India.
[12] Takeachi, M. et al. 1995 Study on a concrete filled steel structure for nuclear power plants,SMiRT13, Porto Alegre , Brazil,August,pp.15-20.
[13] ATENA, Finite element software, Cervenka Consulting, Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.