Deterministic and Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Petroleum Storage of Sabzevar

Document Type : Regular Paper


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Eghbal Lahori Institute, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan


Failure of appropriate resource structures for petroleum products located close to residential areas has irreparable financial and fatal consequences. Thus, a seismic hazard analysis in estimating strong ground motions seems essential for constructing or improving such structures. For this purpose, firstly, by using the deterministic method and empirical equations of the largest earthquake likely to occur, the result of active faults activity was determined using attenuation equations via an appropriate logic tree, and the maximum horizontal and vertical acceleration component was calculated based on two types of soil. The first type of soil matches types I and II, and the second type matches III and IV, from standard No.2800. Then, to analyze the potential hazard, we define the seismic sources, seismic parameters, rupture parameters, and the attenuation equations with the same logic tree using SeisRisk III software, plus the maximum vertical and horizontal acceleration component, based on the two identical types of soil. Subsequently, the seismic improvement regulation of structures (360 magazine) for the second level hazard was calculated and finally compared with the results of the deterministic analysis. Results indicated that the acceleration component in the deterministic method presents a higher amount than the probable method. As a result, probable methods can be used instead of a deterministic method proving far more economical.


Main Subjects

[1]          Cornell CA, Newmark NM. Seismic reliability of nuclear power plants.  Probabilistic analysis of nuclear reactor safety 1978.
[2]          Bakhshi H, Rezaie Z. Preparation of same acceleration maps for use in the improvement of structures in Sabzevar city. Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering. 2021;9:101-19.
[3]          Sunardi B. Re-Evaluation of Seismic Hazard in Tasikmalaya City Using Probabilistic Approach. International Journal of GEOMATE. 2019;17.
[4]          Chen Y, Hu J, Peng F. Seismological challenges in earthquake hazard reductions: reflections on the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Science Bulletin. 2018;63(17):1159-66.
[5]          Valikangs P, Laitonen J, Okako O, Sandberg J. Comparison of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of nuclear power plants in areas with different levels of seismic activity, Nuclear Safety NEA/CSNI/R. 2019.
[6]          Waseem M, Lai CG, Spacone E. Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan. Natural Hazards. 2018;90(2):563-600.
[7]          Mousavi SM, Beroza GC, Hoover SM. Variabilities in probabilistic seismic hazard maps for natural and induced seismicity in the central and eastern United States. The Leading Edge. 2018;37(2):141a1-a9.
[8]          Dipova N, Cangir B. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the two-layer fault system of Antalya (SW Turkey) area. Journal of Seismology. 2017;21(5):1067-77.
[9]          ICOLD. Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams, Guidelines. Bulletin 72, International Commission on Large Dams, Paris. 1989.
[10]        No S. 2800 "Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings." Third Revision, Building and Housing Research Center, Tehran. 2005.
[11]        Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the seismological Society of America. 1994;84(4):974-1002.
[12]        Saharkhiz M, Bakhshi H. Vulnerability assessment and seismic risk determination of residential buildings in Sabzevar City.  The first annual conference of Architecture, Urban planning & Urban management2015.
[13]        Hessami K, Jamali F, Tabassi H. Active Fault Map of Iran. International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran. 2003.
[14]        Nowroozi AA. Empirical relations between magnitudes and fault parameters for earthquakes in Iran. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1985;75(5):1327-38.
[15]        Bakhshipour Sedaposhte A, Fahimi Farzam M. An Overview of the Concepts Earthquake and Applications of Seismic Risk Analysis and the Introduction of Methodology PSHA and DSHA. Road. 2018;26(94):87-104.
[16]        Ramazi H, Schenk V. Preliminary results obtained from strong ground motion analyses of Iranian earthquakes. Proceedings, XXIV General Assembly of the ESC 1994;3:1762-70.
[17]        Campbell K, Bozorgnia Y, editors. New empirical models for predicting near-source horizontal, vertical, and V/H response spectra: Implications for design. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Seismic Zonation; 2000.
[18]        Khademi M, editor Attenuation of peak and spectral accelerations in the Persian plateau. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2002.
[19]        Nowroozi AA. Attenuation relations for peak horizontal and vertical accelerations of earthquake ground motion in Iran: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. 2005;7(2):109.
[20]        Mahdavian A, editor Empirical evaluation of attenuation relations of peak ground acceleration in the Zagros and central Iran. Proceedings of First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology; 2006.
[21]        Amiri GG, Mahdavian A, Dana FM. Attenuation relationships for Iran. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2007;11(4):469-92.
[22]        Amiri GG, Mahdavian A, Dana FM. Response on the Discussion of "Attenuation Relationships for Iran." Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2007;11(6):1036-7.
[23]     MPO Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Building, Standard No 360. Management and Planning Organization, Tehran, Iran, (in Persian). 2007Department of Civil Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran