Active Structural Control by Backstepping Design Considering Soil-structure Interaction Effects

Document Type : Regular Paper

Authors

1 Young Researchers and Elites Club, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran

Abstract

Considering the dependency of control algorithms to the structural dynamic properties that are affected by soil structure interactions (SSI), the investigation of SSI effect on different control methods has gained great importance. Backstepping design as a recursive lyapanov-based method is one of the powerful active control approaches. However, the effect of soil structure interaction on it has not yet been investigated. This paper studies the performance of backstepping design on mitigating the seismic response of a building structure subjected to base excitations, considering the SSI effect. For this purpose, the SSI model equations were entered in the control algorithm and various shear wave velocities were considered to demonstrate the performance of backstepping control design on soft and stiff soil. According to the numerical results, for structures rested on stiff soil, the variations in the responses of controlled structure caused by SSI is negligible. However, in the case of soft soil, SSI effects cause noticeable changes in dynamic responses of controlled structure that cannot be ignored.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1]     Lezgy-Nazargah M, Elahi A, Pakizeh Tali M. H∞ control method for seismically excited building structures with time-delay: Https://DoiOrg/101177/1077546319890010 2020;26:865–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546319890010.
[2]     Beheshti-Aval SB, Lezgy-Nazargah M, Beheshti-Aval SB, Lezgy-Nazargah M. Smart Structures and Systems. Smart Struct Syst 2010;6:921. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2010.6.8.921.
[3]     Beheshti Aval SB, Ahmadian V, Maldar M, Darvishan E. Damage detection of structures using signal processing and artificial neural networks: Https://DoiOrg/101177/1369433219886079 2019;23:884–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219886079.
[4]     Preumont A. Vibration Control of Active Structures 2011;179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2033-6.
[5]     Wu WH, Wang JF, Lin CC. Systematic assessment of irregular building–soil interaction using efficient modal analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001;30:573–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/EQE.25.
[6]     Aydin E, Ozturk B, Bogdanovic A, Noroozinejad Farsangi E. Influence of soil-structure interaction (SSI) on optimal design of passive damping devices. Structures 2020;28:847–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2020.09.028.
[7]     Shamkhi Al-Ghazali A, Shariatmadar H. Hybrid active control of adjacent buildings interconnected by viscous dampers utilizing type-2 fuzzy controller considering soil-structure interaction. Structures 2021;33:292–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.03.117.
[8]     Wang JF, Lin CC. Seismic performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for soil–irregular building interaction systems. Int J Solids Struct 2005;42:5536–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2005.02.042.
[9]     Golnargesi S, Shariatmadar H, Razavi HM. Seismic control of buildings with active tuned mass damper through interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller including soil–structure interaction. Asian J Civ Eng 2018 192 2018;19:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42107-018-0016-5.
[10]   Amini F, Shadlou M. Embedment effects of flexible foundations on control of structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2011;31:1081–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2010.12.007.
[11]   Lee MH. Active control to reduce the horizontal seismic response of buildings taking into account the soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2012;42:132–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2012.06.018.
[12]   Luco JE. Effects of soil–structure interaction on seismic base isolation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2014;66:167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2014.05.007.
[13]   Baratta A, Corbi I, Corbi O. Algorithm design of an hybrid system embedding influence of soil for dynamic vibration control. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2015;74:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2015.03.011.
[14]   Nazarimofrad E, Zahrai SM. Seismic control of irregular multistory buildings using active tendons considering soil–structure interaction effect. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2016;89:100–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2016.07.005.
[15]   Nazarimofrad E, Farahani S, Zahrai SM. Multiobjective optimal placement of active tendons to control irregular multistory buildings with soil–structure interaction. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 2019;28:e1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/TAL.1581.
[16]   Bekda┼č G, Nigdeli SM. Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2017;92:443–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILDYN.2016.10.019.
[17]   Khalil HK. Nonlinear systems third edition. Patience Hall 2002;115.
[18]   Kokotovic P V., Kanellakopoulos I, Morse AS. Adaptive feedback linearization of nonlinear systems. Lect Notes Control Inf Sci 1991;160:309–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFB0044779.
[19]   Astolfi A, Karagiannis D, Ortega R. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control with Applications 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-066-7.
[20]   Wolf JP. Simple physical models for foundation dynamics. Dev Geotech Eng 1998;83:1–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1250(98)80004-7.
[21]   Pozo F, Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. Control of hysteretic base-isolated structures: An adaptive backstepping approach. Proc 44th IEEE Conf Decis Control Eur Control Conf CDC-ECC ’05 2005;2005:5516–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2005.1583040.
[22]   Perelman DS, Parmelee RA, Lee S-L. Seismic Response of Single-Story Interaction Systems. J Struct Div 1968;94:2597–608. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0002120.
Volume 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 28
November 2022
Pages 97-108
  • Receive Date: 09 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 07 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 December 2021
  • First Publish Date: 17 December 2021