Effect of Near-Fault Earthquake Characteristics on Seismic Response of Mid-Rise Structures with Triple Friction Pendulum Isolator

Document Type : Regular Paper

Authors

1 Department of Building and Construction Techniques Engineering, Al- Mustaqbal University College, 51001 Hilla, Iraq

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran

Abstract

Pulses of near-fault earthquakes are very effective in the seismic response of the Triple Friction Pendulum Isolator (TFPI). In previous studies, the effect of original bi-directional pulses components on the isolated tall buildings by TFPI was neglected. Also, the effect of changing the design parameters of TFPI on preventing seismic disaster in this type of building is unknown. For this reason, a 10 stories moment steel structure mounted on TFPI was designed. Then, the seven pairs of bidirectional near-fault earthquake records without and with removal pulses were applied to the isolated structure. The results show that the seismic responses on the base level decrease by reducing the velocity pulse amplitude (AP) and increasing the velocity pulse period (TP), also if the period of the isolators (TM) is being higher than TP, the seismic responses on the upper floors reduce. Moreover, Increasing the geometrical dimensions of the TFPI can significantly reduce the seismic effect of near-fault earthquake with pulses.

Highlights

  • The influence of pulse characteristics, including pulse period and pulse amplitude, on the seismic response of isolated buildings is investigated.
  • ‎The impact of triple friction pendulum geometry on the seismic response of isolated buildings is identified.‎
  • The effect of bi-directional earthquakes on the performance of base isolation systems is explored.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     Mansouri S. The investigation of the effect of using energy dissipation equipment in seismic retrofitting an exist highway RC bridge subjected to far-fault earthquakes. Int J Bridg Eng 2021;9:51–84.
[2]     Mansouri S, Kontoni DPN, Pouraminian M. The effects of the duration, intensity and magnitude of far-fault earthquakes on the seismic response of RC bridges retrofitted with seismic bearings. Adv Bridg Eng 2022;3:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-022-00069-8.
[3]     Mansouri S, Nazari A. The Effects of Using Different Seismic Bearing on the Behavior and Seismic Response of High-Rise Building. Civ Eng J 2017;3:160–71. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2017-00000082.
[4]     Kuvat A, Sadoglu E, Zardari S. Experimental Investigation of Sand–Rubber–Bitumen Mixtures as a Geotechnical Seismic Isolation Material. Int J Geomech 2024;24:319–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7015.
[5]     Movahhed AS, Zardari S, Şadoğlu E. Seismic performance of a building base-isolated by TFP susceptible to pound with a surrounding moat wall. Earthquakes Struct 2022;23:723–36. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2022.23.1.723.
[6]     Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. A Simple Pendulum Technique for Achieving Seismic Isolation. Earthq Spectra 1990;6:317–33. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585573.
[7]     Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Behaviour of the double concave Friction Pendulum bearing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2006;35:1403–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.589.
[8]     Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Theory. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2008;37:163–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.751.
[9]     Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Experimental verification. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2008;37:185–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.750.
[10]   Majdi A, Sadeghi-Movahhed A, Mashayekhi M, Zardari S, Benjeddou O, De Domenico D. On the Influence of Unexpected Earthquake Severity and Dampers Placement on Isolated Structures Subjected to Pounding Using the Modified Endurance Time Method. Buildings 2023;13:1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051278.
[11]   Sadeghi Movahhed A, Shirkhani A, Zardari S, Mashayekhi M, Noroozinejad Farsangi E, Majdi A. Modified endurance time method for seismic performance assessment of base-isolated structures. J Build Eng 2023;67:105955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105955.
[12]   Morgan TA, Mahin SA. Achieving reliable seismic performance enhancement using multi‐stage friction pendulum isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2010;39:1443–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1043.
[13]   Becker TC, Mahin SA. Experimental and analytical study of the bi‐directional behavior of the triple friction pendulum isolator. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012;41:355–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1133.
[14]   Ryan KL, Dao ND. Influence of Vertical Ground Shaking on Horizontal Response of Seismically Isolated Buildings with Friction Bearings. J Struct Eng 2016;142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001352.
[15]   Dhankot MA, Soni DP. Behaviour of Triple Friction Pendulum isolator under forward directivity and fling step effect. KSCE J Civ Eng 2017;21:872–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0690-3.
[16]   Moeindarbari H, Taghikhany T. Seismic optimum design of triple friction pendulum bearing subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 2014;50:701–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1079-x.
[17]   Tajammolian H, Khoshnoudian F, Talaei S, Loghman V. The effects of peak ground velocity of near-field ground motions on the seismic responses of base-isolated structures mounted on friction bearings. Earthquakes Struct 2014;7:1159–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1259.
[18]   Sarlis AA, Constantinou MC. Modeling triple friction pendulum isolators in program SAP2000. The technical report released to the engineering community. New York: 2010.
[19]   Constantinou, M.C. Kalpakidis I, Filiatrault A, Ecker Lay RA. LRFD-Based Analysis and Design Procedures for Bridge Bearings and Seismic Isolators: MCEER-11-0004. Buffalo, NY, USA: 2011.
[20]   McVitty WJ, Constantinou MC. Property modification factors for seismic isolators: design guidance for buildings: MCEER-15-0005. Buffalo, NY, USA: 2015.
[21]   Oikonomou, K. Constantinou MC, Reinhorn AM, Kempner L. Seismic isolation of high voltage electrical power transformers: MCEER-16-0006. Buffalo, NY, USA: 2016.
[22]   Amiri GG, Namiranian P, Amiri MS. Seismic Response of Triple Friction Pendulum Bearing under Near-Fault Ground Motions. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2015;16:1550021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500212.
[23]   Becker TC, Bao Y, Mahin SA. Extreme behavior in a triple friction pendulum isolated frame. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2017;46:2683–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2924.
[24]   ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA: 2017.
[25]   Mokha A, Constantinou M, Reinhorn A. Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation I: Testing. J Struct Eng 1990;116:438–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(438).
[26]   Mokha A, Constantinou M, Reinhorn A. Further Results on Frictional Properties of Teflon Bearings. J Struct Eng 1991;117:622–6. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:2(622).
[27]   Constantinou M, Mokha A, Reinhorn A. Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation II: Modeling. J Struct Eng 1990;116:455–74. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:2(455).
[28]   ANSI/AISC 360-16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, IL: 2016.
[29]   ANSI/AISC 341-16. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, IL: 2016.
[30]   Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI). SAP2000, Integrated Solution for Structural Analysis and Design. Berkeley, CA, USA: 2015.
[31]   Sadeghi Movahhed A, Shirkhani A, Zardari S, Noroozinejad Farsangi E, Karimi Pour A. Effective range of base isolation design parameters to improve structural performance under far and near-fault earthquakes. Adv Struct Eng 2022;26:52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221119870.
[32]   ASCE/SEI 41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA: 2017.
[33]   Baker JW. Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2007;97:1486–501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
[34]   PEER. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Ground motion database 2020. https://doi.org/https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
[35]   FEMA P-1051. 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions: Design Examples. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC: 2016.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 April 2023
  • Revise Date: 03 June 2023
  • Accept Date: 05 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics