An Outcome Overview of Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in Mataram City Post Lombok Earthquake Disaster

Document Type : Regular Paper

Authors

1 Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Mataram, Jl. Majapahit 62 Mataram, 83125, Indonesia

2 Architecture Study Program, Engineering Faculty, University of Mataram, Jl. Majapahit 62 Mataram, 83125, Indonesia

Abstract

Several strong earthquakes hit Lombok Island in 2018. The earthquake that occurred in sequence caused damage to many buildings and even destroyed housing for residents. This residential sector suffered enormous damage and losses in Mataram City, the province's capital. The reconstruction and rehabilitation process was carried out in 2 phases, and the last Phase was completed in April 2021. A total of 14140 houses received assistance funds for repair and rebuilding in the first Phase, while the number of houses receiving repair funds in the second Phase was 1339. Compared to the initial data in the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Action Plan, the number of major damaged houses decreased by 43.66% to 1350 houses. However, the number of medium and minor damaged houses increased to 30.75% and 10.83%, respectively, to 3631 and 9159 houses. Through the implementation of the housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Mataram City, it can be concluded that either the funding or the process was under the central government's guidance. Meanwhile, the local government was an aid to ensure the effective implementation of reconstruction. The relationship between the central and local governments was conducive to running the process effectively and according to the timeline. The local government allows the community to choose the type of earthquake-resistance house for rebuilding. Of the various types of more earthquake-resistant houses, the people preferred the reinforced concrete panel type housing because the construction is faster, so they can live in it immediately.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     Zulfakriza Z. Looking Back at the 2018 Lombok Earthquake and The Seismic History. KompasCom 2018.
[2]     Agustawijaya DS, Taruna RM, Agustawijaya AR. An Update to Seismic Hazard Levels And PSHA for Lombok and Surrounding Islands After Earthquakes in 2018. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng 2020;53.
[3]     Kencanawati NN, Agustawijaya DS, Taruna RM. An Investigation of Building Seismic Design Parameters in Mataram City Using Lombok Earthquake 2018 Ground Motion. J Eng Technol Sci 2020;52. https://doi.org/DOI:10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2020.52.5.4.
[4]     BMKG. Indonesian Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics (BMKG) 2018.
[5]     Salim MA, Siswanto AB, Hari Setijo P, Ardhani MS. Recovery Civil Construction Buildings Due To The Earthquake Lombok. Int J Sci Technol Res 2019;8:814–7.
[6]     National Center for Earthquake Studies. Study of the Series of Earthquakes in Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara Province. Jakarta, Indonesia: 2018.
[7]     Ramdani F, Setiani P, Setiawati DA. Analysis of sequence earthquake of Lombok Island, Indonesia. Prog Disaster Sci 2019;4:100046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100046.
[8]     Panzera F, Lombardo G, Imposa S, Grassi S, Gresta S, Catalano S, et al. Correlation between earthquake damage and seismic site effects: The study case of Lentini and Carlentini, Italy. Eng Geol 2018;240:149–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.04.014.
[9]     Mataram City Government. Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Plan after the Lombok Earthquake Disaster 2018 for Mataram, City. 2018.
[10]   Cabinet Secretariat Office of Republic Indonesia. The Acceleration of Post-Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction in West Lombok Regency, North Lombok Regency, Central Lombok Regency, East Lombok Regency, Mataram City, and Affected Areas in West Nusa Tenggara Province,. 2018.
[11]   Yakin ARI. The Role of Central Government following the Lombok Earthquake 2018: the planning process and ownership and control of the Mataram City Post-Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Plan: A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requireme. Lincoln University, 2020.
[12]   Peacock WG, Dash N, Zhang Y. Sheltering and Housing Recovery Following Disaster*. Handb. Disaster Res., New York, NY: Springer New York; 2007, p. 258–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_15.
[13]   Einali J, Yeganeh BM, Cheraghi M, Feyzolahpour M. Evaluating the effects of reconstruction of the damaged villages in the 2002 earthquake in Avaj, Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020;43:101373.
[14]   Sharma K, Apil KC, Subedi M, Pokharel B. Post disaster reconstruction after 2015 Gorkha earthquake: challenges and influencing factors. J Inst Eng 2018;14:52–63.
[15]   Dangi TB. Post Disaster Reconstruction in Sindhupalchok after Earthquake 2015: Problem and Prospects. J APF Command Staff Coll 2018;1:21–27. https://doi.org/10.3126/japfcsc.v1i1.26709.
[16]   Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R. The best location of belt truss system in tall buildings using multiple criteria subjected to blast loading. Civ Eng J 2018;4:1338–53.
[17]   Kamgar R, Rahgozar R. Determination of optimum location for flexible outrigger systems in tall buildings with constant cross section consisting of framed tube, shear core, belt truss and outrigger system using energy method. Int J Steel Struct 2017;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-0172-8.
[18]   Kamgar R, Rahgozar P. Reducing static roof displacement and axial forces of columns in tall buildings based on obtaining the best locations for multi-rigid belt truss outrigger systems. Asian J Civ Eng 2019;20:759–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00142-0.
[19]   Kamgar R, Rahgozar P. Optimum location for the belt truss system for minimum roof displacement of steel buildings subjected to critical excitation. Steel Compos Struct An Int J 2020;37:463–79.
[20]   Tavakoli R, Kamgar R, Rahgozar R. Seismic performance of outrigger–belt truss system considering soil–structure interaction. Int J Adv Struct Eng 2019;11:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-0215-7.
[21]   Kamgar R, Saadatpour MM. A simple mathematical model for free vibration analysis of combined system consisting of framed tube, shear core, belt truss and outrigger system with geometrical discontinuities. Appl Math Model 2012;36:4918–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.029.
[22]   Pribadi KS, Abduh M, Wirahadikusumah RD, Hanifa NR, Irsyam M, Kusumaningrum P, et al. Learning from past earthquake disasters: The need for knowledge management system to enhance infrastructure resilience in Indonesia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021;64:102424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102424.
[23]   Li Q, Umaier K, Koide O. Research on post-Wenchuan earthquake recovery and reconstruction implementation: A case study of housing reconstruction of Dujiangyan City. Prog Disaster Sci 2019;4:100041. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100041.
[24]   Hoseynzadeh H, Mortezaei A. Seismic Vulnerability and Rehabilitation of One of The World’s Oldest Masonry Minaret under The Different Earthquake Frequency Contents. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2021;9:12–36.
[25]   Alisjahbana I, Kiremidjian A. Modeling housing recovery after the 2018 Lombok earthquakes using a stochastic queuing model. Earthq Spectra 2021;37:587–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020970972.
[26]   Ahmed I. An overview of post‐disaster permanent housing reconstruction in developing countries. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 2011;2:148–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901111149141.
[27]   Bakhshi H, Rezaie Z. Preparation of same acceleration maps for use in the improvement of structures in Sabzevar city. J Rehabil Civ Eng 2021;9:101–19.
[28]   Bakti HK, Nurmandi A. Post Earthquake Disaster Recovery In North Lombok In 2018 (in Indonesian). Geogr J 2020;12:137–51. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v12i02.16750.
[29]   Horney J, Dwyer C, Chirra B, McCarthy K, Shafer J, Smith G. Measuring Successful Disaster Recovery. Int J Mass Emergencies \& Disasters 2018;36.
[30]   AFP News Agency. Indonesia: Earthquake since July 28 n.d.
[31]   Mataram (city) n.d.
[32]   Mataram City Administration Map n.d.
[33]   SNI 2847-2019. Structural Concrete Requirements for Buildings. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian Standardization Agency; 2019.
[34]   SNI 1726-2019. Indonesia National Standard Code: Earthquake Resistance for Structures of Buildings and Non-Buildings. Jakarta, Indonesia: 2019.
[35]   Ministry of Public Works and Housing. Healthy Simple Instant Home (RISHA) 2021.
[36]   Saputra, Choirul Rama. Rehabilitation and reconstruction of community housing post-West Nusa Tenggara Earthquake 2018 (A case of Lauk Rurung Timuk and Lauk Rurung Barat Sub-villages, Sembalun Bumbung, Sembalun, East Lombok). E3S Web Conf 2020;156:5017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015605017.
[37]   Sabaruddin A, Sukmana NP. RISHA Simple Healthy Instant Home. Jakarta, Indonesia: Center for Research and Development of Housing and Settlements, Ministry of Public Works and Housing; 2015.
[38]   Istijono B, Ophiyandri T, Chairisna D, Tadzkia A. Communities’ Satisfaction towards Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program after September 30, 2009, Earthquake in West Sumatra. J Constr Eng 2016;2016:2148408. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2148408.
[39]   Suryani E. The Effectiveness of the Post-Earthquake Disaster Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program in Lombok Island. J Socio-Economic Humanit (in Indones 2021;7:197–206.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 October 2022
  • Revise Date: 15 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 16 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics