A Review of Innovative Architectural Façade Strategies for Seismic Design of Tall Buildings

Document Type : Regular Paper

Authors

1 Department of Architecture, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Cyprus

2 Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

3 Department of Business Administration, Akre University for Applied Science, Duhok-Akre, Iraq

4 Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Cyprus

5 Department of Civil Engineering, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus

6 Department of Civil Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Cyprus

Abstract

Designing tall buildings in seismic zones poses significant challenges and requires innovative approaches to ensure structural integrity and aesthetic appeal. Despite the significant advancements in architectural and structural engineering, the literature still lacks a review article that discusses various façade strategies to combine seismic resilience with architectural innovation. This study addresses this gap by reviewing innovative façade technologies and design strategies that enhance the seismic performance of high-rise buildings. Among the discussed façade systems, double-skin façades, when designed as seismic absorbers, can reduce vibrations by 25%. Moreover, the glazed curtain walls can reduce it by 20% to 25%. Other notable systems include masonry building façades, double-skin façades, and multi-hazard resilient façades and approaches that combine multiple mitigation strategies. These findings highlight the importance of integrating seismic performance considerations into façade design and contributes to the development of safer and more resilient tall buildings. The insights offered are valuable for architects, engineers, and urban planners in advancing sustainable and resilient urban environments in earthquake-prone areas.

Highlights

  • The integration of façade design with seismic resilience is crucial, transforming seismic challenges into architectural opportunities.
  • Performance-based seismic design enables tailored solutions for tall buildings, considering the unique dynamic interactions between structural and non-structural elements.
  • Advanced façade technologies significantly enhance seismic performance, reducing inter-story drift ratios and mitigating structural damage.
  • Innovative strategies offer dynamic responses to seismic forces, improving building resilience and preserving aesthetic integrity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     Ali MM, Moon KS. Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects. Archit Sci Rev 2007;50:205–23. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5027.
[2]     Ali MM, Moon KS. Advances in Structural Systems for Tall Buildings: Emerging Developments for Contemporary Urban Giants. Buildings 2018;8:104. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8080104.
[3]     Hussain SH, Hussain MS. The strategies of architectural design resisting earthquake in tall buildings. Al-Nahrain J Eng Sci 2017;20:436–45.
[4]     Al-Kodmany K. Sustainable tall buildings: toward a comprehensive design approach. Int J Sustain Des 2012;2:1–23.
[5]     Al-Kodmany K. Sustainability and the 21st Century Vertical City: A Review of Design Approaches of Tall Buildings. Buildings 2018;8:102. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8080102.
[6]     K P VV, Shivakumar GS. The Evolution of Structural Systems in Tall Buildings: From Ancient Skyscrapers to Future Megatowers of the Future. INTERANTIONAL J Sci Res Eng Manag 2023;07:1–11. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM27554.
[7]     Bianchi S, Andriotis C, Klein T, Overend M. Multi-criteria design methods in façade engineering: State-of-the-art and future trends. Build Environ 2024;250:111184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111184.
[8]     Zhang Y, Schauer T, Bleicher A. Optimized passive/semi-active vibration control using distributed-multiple tuned facade damping system in tall buildings. J Build Eng 2022;52:104416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104416.
[9]     Fernando D, Navaratnam S, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Study of Technological Advancement and Challenges of Façade System for Sustainable Building: Current Design Practice. Sustainability 2023;15:14319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914319.
[10]   Shrivastava R, Sahu DL. Advancements in Facade Systems: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis. Int J Innov Res Technol Sci 2024;12:300–8.
[11]    Arnold C. Risk Management Series: Designing for Earthquakes. FEMA 2006.
[12]   Shoushtari AV. Seismic Hazard Assessment of Peninsular Malaysia Based on New Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Subduction Earthquakes 2016.
[13]   Naeim F. Performance based seismic design of tall buildings. Earthq Eng Eur 2010:147–69.
[14]   Moehle JP. The tall buildings initiative for alternative seismic design. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 2007;16:559–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.435.
[15]   Initiative TB. Seismic Design Guidelines for Tall Buildings. Univ California, Berkeley 2010.
[16]   Moehle JP. Seismic analysis, design, and review for tall buildings. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 2006;15:495–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.378.
[17]   Moehle J, Bozorgnia Y, Yang TY. The tall buildings initiative. Proc. SEAOC Conv. Squaw Creek, CA, USA, Citeseer; 2007, p. 315–24.
[18]   Jiang HJ, Lu XL, Liu XJ, He LS. Performance-Based Seismic Design Principles and Structural Analysis of Shanghai Tower. Adv Struct Eng 2014;17:513–27. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.4.513.
[19]   Poulos HG. Foundation Design for Tall Buildings. Geotech. Eng. State Art Pract., Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2012, p. 786–809. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412138.0028.
[20]   Eroğlu A. Seismic design optimization and seismic performance of tall buildings and seismic performance. High Eng Thesis, Gebze Tech Univ Grad Sch Nat Appl Sci Gebze 2017.
[21]   Nouri Y, Jouneghani HG, Haghollahi A, Hemati E, Hemati SA, Mortazavi M. Experimental and numerical investigation of a steel yielding arc and ring damper. Structures 2024;68:107140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107140.
[22]   Lew M, Naeim F, Hudson MB, Korin BO. Challenges in specifying ground motions for design of tall buildings in high seismic regions of the United States. 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. Beijing, 2008.
[23]   Imad Shakir, Mohammed Ahmed Jasim, Sardasht S. Weli. High Rise Buildings: Design, Analysis, and Safety. Int J Archit Eng Technol 2021;8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2021.08.1.
[24]   Barluenga G, Hernández-Olivares F, León YRT. Seismic reponse of a new design for vertical joints in architectural panels. Eng Struct 2003;25:1655–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00144-5.
[25]   Nardini V, Doebbel F. Performance-based concept for design of structural silicone joints in façades exposed to earthquake. Challenging Glas. Conf. Proc., vol. 5, 2016, p. 283–94.
[26]   Casagrande L, Bonati A, Occhiuzzi A, Caterino N, Auricchio F. Numerical investigation on the seismic dissipation of glazed curtain wall equipped on high-rise buildings. Eng Struct 2019;179:225–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.086.
[27]   Pipitone G, Barone G, Palmeri A. Optimal design of double-skin façades as vibration absorbers. Struct Control Heal Monit 2018;25:e2086. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2086.
[28]   Marini A, Passoni C, Belleri A, Feroldi F, Preti M, Metelli G, et al. Combining seismic retrofit with energy refurbishment for the sustainable renovation of RC buildings: a proof of concept. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 2022;26:2475–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1363665.
[29]   Golesorkhi R, Joseph L, Klemencic R, Shook D, Viise J. Performance-based seismic design for tall buildings. CTBUH Performance-Based Seism Des Work Gr Tech Guid USA 2017.
[30]   Pipitone G, Barone G, Palmeri A. Stochastic design of double-skin façades as seismic vibration absorbers. Adv Eng Softw 2020;142:102749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102749.
[31]   Lucchini A, Parisi MAV, Stefanazzi A. Seismic Behaviour of Building Façades. Visions Futur. Hous. Mega Cities, Istanbul Technical University; 2012, p. 885–91.
[32]   Lucchini A, Stefanazzi A, Parisi MAV. SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF BUILDING FAÇADES. Int J Hous Sci ITS Appl 2013;37:1–10.
[33]   Hareer RW. Seismic response of building façade system with energy absorbing connections 2007.
[34]   Rihal SS. Seismic behavior and design of precast facades, cladding and connections in low/mediumrise buildings. Rep ARCE R88-1, Calif Inst Technol 1988.
[35]   Sivanerupan S, Wilson J, Gad E, Lam N. Seismic assessment of glazed facade systems 2009.
[36]   Casolo S, Neumair S, Parisi MA, Petrini V. Analysis of Seismic Damage Patterns in Old Masonry Church Facades. Earthq Spectra 2000;16:757–73. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586138.
[37]   Bedon C, Zhang X, Santos F, Honfi D, Kozłowski M, Arrigoni M, et al. Performance of structural glass facades under extreme loads – Design methods, existing research, current issues and trends. Constr Build Mater 2018;163:921–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.153.
[38]   Pallarés FJ, Davia A, Hassan WM, Pallarés L. Experimental and analytical assessment of the influence of masonry façade infills on seismic behavior of RC frame buildings. Eng Struct 2021;235:112031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112031.
[39]   Preciado A, Orduña A, Bartoli G, Budelmann H. Façade seismic failure simulation of an old Cathedral in Colima, Mexico by 3D Limit Analysis and nonlinear Finite Element Method. Eng Fail Anal 2015;49:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.003.
[40]   Giresini L, Paone S, Sassu M. Integrated Cost-Analysis Approach for Seismic and Thermal Improvement of Masonry Building Façades. Buildings 2020;10:143. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10080143.
[41]   Wellershoff F, Förch M, Lori G, Zobec M, Casucci D, Grosser P. Façade Brackets for Blast Enhancement. Ce/Papers 2018;2:351–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.936.
[42]   Bellamy L, Palermo AG, Sullivan T. Developing innovative facades with improved seismic and sustainability performance 2017.
[43]   Fu TS, Zhang R. Integrating Double-Skin Façades and Mass Dampers for Structural Safety and Energy Efficiency. J Archit Eng 2016;22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000218.
[44]   Zhang Y, Schauer T, Wernicke L, Vrontos A, Engelmann M, Wulff W, et al. Design of moveable façade elements for energy harvesting and vibration control of super slender tall buildings under wind excitation. Powerskin Conf. Munich, 2021, p. 978–94.
[45]   Bianchi S. Integrating resilience in the multi-hazard sustainable design of buildings. Disaster Prev Resil 2023;2. https://doi.org/10.20517/dpr.2023.16.
[46]   Calvi GM, Sousa L, Ruggeri C. Energy Efficiency and Seismic Resilience: A Common Approach. Multi-hazard Approaches to Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016, p. 165–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_9.
[47]   Sun Moon K. Structural Design of Double Skin Facades as Damping Devices for Tall Buildings. Procedia Eng 2011;14:1351–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.170.
[48]   Requena-Garcia-Cruz M-V, Díaz-Borrego J, Romero-Sánchez E, Morales-Esteban A, Campano M-A. Assessment of Integrated Solutions for the Combined Energy Efficiency Improvement and Seismic Strengthening of Existing URM Buildings. Buildings 2022;12:1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081276.
[49]   Ghasemi Jouneghani H, Nouri Y, Mortazavi M, Haghollahi A, Memarzadeh P. Seismic Performance Factors of Elliptic-Braced Frames with Rotational Friction Dampers through IDA. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 2024;29:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1540.
[50]   Ghasemi Jouneghani H, Nouri Y, Memarzadeh P, Haghollahi A, Hemati E. Seismic performance and failure mechanisms evaluation of multi-story elliptic and mega-elliptic bracing frames: Experimental and numerical investigation. Structures 2024;70:107658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107658.
[51]   Phocas MC, Sophocleous T. Kinetic structures in architecture. 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., 2008, p. 10–2.
[52]   Phocas MC. Lightweight Tensile Structures towards an Architectural-Engineering Integration. J Archit Eng Technol 2014;03. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9717.S10-e001.
[53]   Charleson A. Seismic design for architects. Routledge; 2012.
[54]   Fouad S. Design methodology: Kinetic architecture. Archit Eng Alexandria Univ 2012.
[55]   Mezzi M. Principles of conceptual design for new seismic protection systems. Struct Archit 2010:409.
[56]   İlerisoy ZY, Başeğmez MP. Conceptual research of movement in kinetic architecture. Gazi Univ J Sci 2018;31:342–52.
[57]   Elmokadem A, Ekram M, Waseef A, Nashaat B. Kinetic Architecture: Concepts, History and Applications. Int J Sci Res 2018;7:750–8. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20181560.
[58]   Linn C. Kinetic architecture: design for active envelopes. Images publishing; 2014.
[59]   Johnson A, Zheng S, Nakano A, Schierle G, Choi J-H. Adaptive Kinetic Architecture and Collective Behavior: A Dynamic Analysis for Emergency Evacuation. Buildings 2019;9:44. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9020044.
[60]   Bigolin M. Towards evolutionary resilience in the housebuilding sector: a framework proposal and an application to building skin 2018.
[61]   Patterson M. Resilience by design: building facades for tomorrow. Rethink. Build. Ski., Elsevier; 2022, p. 359–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822477-9.00002-4.
[62]   Maclise L, Nelson T, Kyler M, Kang G, Hohener S, Littler P, et al. Comparing Adaptability - A Case Study of Three Historic Buildings. Struct. Congr. 2013, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2013, p. 2767–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412848.240.
[63]   Al-Obaidi KM, Azzam Ismail M, Hussein H, Abdul Rahman AM. Biomimetic building skins: An adaptive approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;79:1472–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.028.
[64]   Tena-Colunga A, Hernández-Ramírez H, Godínez-Domínguez EA, Pérez-Rocha LE. Mexico City during and after the September 19, 2017 earthquake: Assessment of seismic resilience and ongoing recovery process. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 2021;11:1275–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00511-x.
[65]   Burton H V., Deierlein G, Lallemant D, Lin T. Framework for Incorporating Probabilistic Building Performance in the Assessment of Community Seismic Resilience. J Struct Eng 2016;142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001321.
[66]   Kim K. Resilience-based Facade Design Framework: A case study on facade systems under seismic and heat hazard 2023.
[67]   Zaryoun M, Hosseini M. Lightweight fiber-reinforced clay as a sustainable material for disaster resilient architecture of future buildings. Archit Eng Des Manag 2019;15:430–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2018.1540968.
[68]   Rossetti M, Milardi M, Sansotta S. Seismic Evaluation of a Curtain Wall System for Improving the Adaptive Performance of Connecting Nonstructural Components, 2023, p. 205–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33148-0_17.
[69]   Abtahi P. Energy dissipating façade systems designed to reduce structural response during earthquakes 2017.
[70]   Luo Y, Zhang L, Bozlar M, Liu Z, Guo H, Meggers F. Active building envelope systems toward renewable and sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2019;104:470–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.005.
[71]   Yazdizad A, Rezaei F, Faizi F. Classification of double skin façade and their function to reduce energy consumption and create sustainability in buildings. 2nd Int. Congr. Struct. Archit. Urban Dev., vol. 16, 2014.
[72]   Graamans L, Tenpierik M, van den Dobbelsteen A, Stanghellini C. Plant factories: Reducing energy demand at high internal heat loads through façade design. Appl Energy 2020;262:114544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114544.
[73]   Yu G, Yang H, Yan Z, Kyeredey Ansah M. A review of designs and performance of façade-based building integrated photovoltaic-thermal (BIPVT) systems. Appl Therm Eng 2021;182:116081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116081.
[74]   Radhi H, Sharples S, Fikiry F. Will multi-facade systems reduce cooling energy in fully glazed buildings? A scoping study of UAE buildings. Energy Build 2013;56:179–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.030.
[75]   Sarihi S, Mehdizadeh Saradj F, Faizi M. A Critical Review of Façade Retrofit Measures for Minimizing Heating and Cooling Demand in Existing Buildings. Sustain Cities Soc 2021;64:102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102525.
[76]   Pinelli J-P, Craig JI, Goodno BJ. Energy-Based Seismic Design of Ductile Cladding Systems. J Struct Eng 1995;121:567–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:3(567).
[77]   Zuazua-Ros A, Martín Gómez C, Ramos JC, Bermejo-Busto J. Towards cooling systems integration in buildings: Experimental analysis of a heat dissipation panel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;72:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.065.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 April 2024
  • Revise Date: 14 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 10 August 2024

Share

How to cite

Statistics