Selection of Optimal Intensity Measure for Seismic Assessment of Steel Buckling Restrained Braced Frames under Near-Fault Ground Motions

Document Type: Regular Paper

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) have a similar behavior under compression and tension loadings. Therefore, they can be applied as a favorable lateral load resisting system for structures. In the performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework, an intermediate variable called intensity measure (IM) links the seismic hazard analysis with the structural response analyses. An optimal IM has desirable features including efficiency, sufficiency and predictability. In this research, the efficiency and sufficiency of some traditional, cumulative-based, and advanced scalar IMs to predict maximum interstory drift ratio (MIDR) demand on low- to mid-rise steel structures with BRBs, under near-fault ground motion records having forward directivity, are investigated. The results show that most of the IMs considered are not sufficient with respect to source-to-site distance (R), for predicting MIDR. It is also shown that decreasing the strain hardening ratio decreases the efficiency of the IMs. In addition, IMM(λ=0.5) and Saavg are more efficient and also sufficient with respect to pulse period (Tp), for predicting MIDR demand on the low-rise steel BRB frames under near-fault ground motions, when compared with the other IMs. In the case of mid-rise structures, PGV and IMM(λ=0.33) are selected as optimal IMs. Due to the higher efficiency and sufficiency of the selected optimal IMs, the obtained fragility curves calculated using these IMs, are more reliable in comparison with the fragility curves calculated using other IMs.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Moehle, J., Deierlein, G. G. (2004). “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering”, In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

[2] Baker, J. W. (2005). “Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis”, Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.

[3] Bradley, B. A., Dhakal, R. P., MacRae G. A., Cubrinovski, M. (2010). “Prediction of Spatially Distributed Seismic Demands in Specific Structures: Ground Motion and Structural Response”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp. 501–520. doi: 10.1002/eqe.954.

[4] Yakhchalian, M., Nicknam, A., Ghodrati Amiri, G. (2015). “Optimal vector-valued intensity measure for seismic collapse assessment of structures”, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 37–54. doi: 10.1007/s11803-015-0005-6.

[5] Kiani, J., Pezeshk, S. (2017). “Sensitivity analysis of the seismic demands of RC moment resisting frames to different aspects of ground motions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 46, Issue 15, pp. 2739–2755. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2928.

[6] Yakhchalian, M., Ghodrati Amiri, G. (2018). “A vector intensity measure to reliably predict maximum drift in low- to mid-rise buildings”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1680/jstbu.17.00040.

[7] Tothong, P., Cornell, C. A. (2008). “Structural performance assessment under near‐source pulse‐like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures”, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 37, Issue 7, pp. 1013–1037.

[8] Yakhchalian, M., Nicknam, A., Ghodrati Amiri, G. (2014). “Proposing an optimal integral-based intensity measure for seismic collapse capacity assessment of structures under pulse-like near-fault ground motions”, Journal of Vibroengineering, Vol. 16, Issue 3, pp. 13601375.

[9] Kalkan, E., Kunnath, S. K. (2006). “Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings”, Earthquake spectra, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 367–390.

[10] Memarpour, M. M., Ghodrati Amiri, G., Razeghi, H., Akbarzadeh, M., Davoudi, A. T. (2016). “Characteristics of horizontal and vertical near-field ground motions and investigation of their effects on the dynamic response of bridges”, Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 1–24.

[11] Champion, C., Liel, A. (2012). “The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 41, Issue 10, pp. 1391–1409.

[12] Rai, D. C., Goel, S. C. (2003). “Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 59, Issue 8, pp. 971–994.

[13] Asgarian, B., Shokrgozar, H. R. (2009). “BRBF response modification factor”, Journal of constructional steel research, Vol. 65, Issue 2, pp. 290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.002.

[14] Bosco, M., Edoardo, M. M. (2013). “Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 42, Issue 8, pp. 1243–1263.

[15] Abdollahzadeh, G., Farzi-Bashir, H., Banihashemi, M. (2014). “Seismic retrofitting of steel frames with buckling restrained and ordinary concentrically bracing systems with various strain hardening and slenderness ratios”, Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 20–31. doi: 10.22075/jrce.2014.205.

[16] Hosseinzadeh, S., Mohebi, B., (2016). “Seismic evaluation of all-steel buckling restrained braces using finite element analysis”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 119, pp. 76–84. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.014.

[17] Jamshidiha, H. R., Yakhchalian, M., Mohebi, B. (2018). “Advanced scalar intensity measures for collapse capacity prediction of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 109, pp. 102–118. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.009.

[18] Cordova, P. P., Deierlein, G. G., Mehanny, S. S., Cornell, C.A. (2000). “Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure”, In the second US-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for reinforced concrete building structures, pp. 187–206.

[19] Mehanny, S. S. (2009). “A broad-range power-law form scalar-based seismic intensity measure”, Engineering Structures,Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 1354–68. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.009.

[20] Bojórquez, E., Iervolino, I. (2011). “Spectral shape proxies and non-linear structural response”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, Issue 7, pp. 996–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.03.006.

[21] Eads, L., Miranda, E., Lignos, D. G. (2015). “Average spectral acceleration as an intensity measure for collapse risk assessment”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 44, Issue 12, pp. 2057–73. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2575.

[22] Bojórquez, E., Chávez, R., Reyes-Salazar, A., Ruiz, S. E., Bojórquez, J. (2017). “A new ground motion intensity measure IB”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 99, pp. 97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.011.

[23] Tothong, P., Luco, N. (2007). “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 36, Issue 13, pp. 1837–1860.

[24] Yakhchalian, M., Ghodrati Amiri, G., Nicknam, A. (2014). “A new proxy for ground motion selection in seismic collapse assessment of tall buildings”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 23, Issue 17, pp. 1275–1293. doi: 10.1002/tal.1143.

[25] Yakhchalian, M., Ghodrati Amiri, G., Eghbali, M. (2017). “Reliable seismic collapse assessment of short-period structures using new proxies for ground motion record selection”, Scientia Iranica, Vol. 24, Issue 5, pp. 2283–2293. doi: 10.24200/sci.2017.4162.

[26] Koopaee, M. E., Dhakal, R. P., MacRae, G. (2017). “Effect of ground motion selection methods on seismic collapse fragility of RC frame buildings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 46, Issue 11, pp. 1875–1892. doi: 10.1002/eqe.2891.

[27] Arias, A. (1970). “A measure of earthquake intensity”, In Seismic design for nuclear power plants, R. J. Hansen (ed.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 438–483.

[28] Benjamin, J. R. (1988). “A criterion for determining exceedances of the operating basis earthquake”, EPRI Report NP-5930, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.

[29] ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). (2010). ASCE 7-10 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE, Reston, VA, USA.

[30] AISC Committee. (2010). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois.

[31] AISC Committee. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings (AISC 341-10), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois.

[32] Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). (2013). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, http://opensees.berkeley.edu.

[33] Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F. H., Scott, M. L., Fenves, G. (2006). OpenSees command language manual.

[34] Guerrero, H., Ji, T., Teran-Gilmore, A., Escobar, J. A. (2016). “A method for preliminary seismic design and assessment of low-rise structures protected with Buckling-Restrained Braces”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 123, pp.141–154. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.015.

[35] Mahdavipour, M. A., Deylami, A. (2014). “Probabilistic assessment of strain hardening ratio effect on residual deformation demands of Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames”, Engineering Structures, Vol. 81, pp. 302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.004.

[36] Uriz, P. (2008). “Toward earthquake-resistant design of concentrically braced steel-frame structures”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.

[37] Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). (2013). PEER Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Database. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu

[38] Benjamin, J. R., Cornell, C. A. (1970). “Probability, statistic, and decision for civil engineers”, New York: McGraw-Hill.

[39] Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G. (2008). “Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment-frame Buildings”, PEER Report 2007/08, Pacific Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

[40] ANG H-S, A., TANG, H. W. (1975). “Probability concepts in engineering planning and design”, Vol. 1, Basic Principles.

[41] Baker, J. W., Cornell, C. A. (2008). “Vector-valued intensity measures for pulse-like near-fault ground motions”, Engineering Structures,Vol. 30, Issue 4, pp. 1048–57. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.009.

[42] Maleki, M., Ahmady Jazany, R., Ghobadi, M. S., (2018). “Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of SMFs with Drilled Flange Connections Subjected to Near-Field Ground Motions”, International Journal of Steel Structures, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s13296-018-0112-0.

[43] Yahyaabadi, A. Tehranizadeh, M. (2011). “New scalar intensity measure for near-fault ground motions based on the optimal combination of spectral responses”, Scientia Iranica, Vol. 18, Issue 6, pp. 1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.scient.2011.09.013.

[44] Yahyazadeh, A., Yakhchalian, M. (2018). “Probabilistic residual drift assessment of SMRFs with linear and nonlinear viscous dampers”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 148, pp. 409–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.05.031