Presenting a Statistical Model of Fatigue Prediction for the Effect of Loading Frequency on Reflective Cracks Propagation on Asphalt Layers Improved by Geosynthetics

Document Type : Regular Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

So far, several methods have been proposed for delaying the reflective cracks in pavements. Despite substantial money spent annually on these types of maintenance methods to control reflection cracking in road pavement, none of them has successfully prevented such damage and only delayed crack propagation in improved asphalt overlays. However, some of these methods have been more effective in preventing the initiation of reflective cracks and reducing the severity of their damage in restored pavements. One of the best methods to deal with this issue is using geosynthetic products. The present study investigates the performance of two different types of geocomposites in the reinforcement of asphalt overlays in delaying reflective cracks compared to control samples. To this end, laboratory and statistical studies were performed at different temperatures and loading frequencies. The results showed that using type-I geocomposite will be most effective in increasing fatigue life. On the other hand, among the mentioned factors, the temperature rise will have the most negative effect on the fatigue performance of geocomposite layers in asphalt overlays. Finally, a high-accuracy statistical model of fatigue life based on temperature, frequency, and geocomposite type is presented (i.e., R² and Adjusted R² of 0.987 and 0.981, respectively).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1]     F. Canestrari, L.P. Ingrassia, A review of top-down cracking in asphalt pavements: Causes, models, experimental tools and future challenges, J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (English Ed. 7 (2020) 541–572.
[2]     S. Deilami, G. White, Review of reflective cracking in composite pavements, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 13 (2020) 524–535.
[3]     S. Suresh, Fatigue of materials, Cambridge university press, 1998.
[4]     S. Lv, C. Xia, C. Liu, J. Zheng, F. Zhang, Fatigue equation for asphalt mixture under low temperature and low loading frequency conditions, Constr. Build. Mater. 211 (2019) 1085–1093.
[5]     W. Van Dijk, W. Visser, Energy approach to fatigue for pavement design, in: Assoc. Asph. Paving Technol. Proc, 1977.
[6]     Y.-R. Kim, D.N. Little, R.L. Lytton, Fatigue and healing characterization of asphalt mixtures, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 15 (2003) 75–83.
[7]     R.L. Lytton, Use of geotextiles for reinforcement and strain relief in asphalt concrete, Geotext. Geomembranes. 8 (1989) 217–237.
[8]     A. Khodaii, S. Fallah, F.M. Nejad, Effects of geosynthetics on reduction of reflection cracking in asphalt overlays, Geotext. Geomembranes. 27 (2009) 1–8.
[9]     T.O. Medani, A.A.A. Molenaar, Estimation of fatique characteristics of asphaltic mixes using simple tests, HERON-ENGLISH Ed. 45 (2000) 155–166.
[10]   S. Shen, S. Carpenter, Development of an asphalt fatigue model based on energy principles, Asph. Paving Technol. 76 (2007) 525.
[11]   A. Chowdhury, J. Button, Evaluation of FiberMat® Type B as a Stress Absorbing Membrane, Texas Transp. Institute, Texas A&M Univ. Coll. Station. Texas. (2007).
[12]   S. Saride, V.V. Kumar, Influence of geosynthetic-interlayers on the performance of asphalt overlays on pre-cracked pavements, Geotext. Geomembranes. 45 (2017) 184–196.
[13]   S. Selvaraj, R. Karpurapu, Numerical Analysis of Leutner Shear Tests on Interface Between Geosynthetic and Asphalt Layers, Int. J. Geosynth. Gr. Eng. 7 (2021) 1–18.
[14]   A. Vanelstraete, L. Francken, Numerical modelling of crack initiation under thermal stresses and traffic loads, in: REFLECTIVE Crack. PAVEMENTS. STATE ART Des. Recomm. Proc. Second (MARCH 10-12, 1993) Int. RILEM Conf. LIEGE, BELGIUM, 1993.
[15]   F. Moghadas Nejad, A. Noory, S. Toolabi, S. Fallah, Effect of using geosynthetics on reflective crack prevention, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16 (2015) 477–487.
[16]   E. Pasquini, M. Bocci, F. Canestrari, Laboratory characterisation of optimised geocomposites for asphalt pavement reinforcement, Geosynth. Int. 21 (2014) 24–36.
[17]   K. Sobhan, V. Tandon, Mitigating reflection cracking in asphalt overlays using geosynthetic reinforcements, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 9 (2008) 367–387.
[18]   L.P. Ingrassia, A. Virgili, F. Canestrari, Effect of geocomposite reinforcement on the performance of thin asphalt pavements: Accelerated pavement testing and laboratory analysis, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 12 (2020) e00342.
[19]   F.M. Nejad, S. Asadi, S. Fallah, M. Vadood, Statistical-experimental study of geosynthetics performance on reflection cracking phenomenon, Geotext. Geomembranes. 44 (2016) 178–187.
[20]   G. Ferrotti, F. Canestrari, E. Pasquini, A. Virgili, Experimental evaluation of the influence of surface coating on fiberglass geogrid performance in asphalt pavements, Geotext. Geomembranes. 34 (2012) 11–18.
[21]   F.P. Jaecklin, J. Scherer, Asphalt reinforcing using glass fibre grid" Glasphalt", in: Int. RILEM Conf. Reflective Crack. Pavements, 3rd, 1996, Maastricht, Netherlands, 1996.
[22]   P. Jaskula, D. Rys, M. Stienss, C. Szydlowski, M. Golos, J. Kawalec, Fatigue performance of double-layered asphalt concrete beams reinforced with new type of geocomposites, Materials (Basel). 14 (2021) 2190.
[23]   A. Noory, F. Moghadas Nejad, A. Khodaii, Evaluation of the effective parameters on shear resistance of interface in a geocomposite-reinforced pavement, Int. J. Pavement Eng. 20 (2019) 1106–1117.
[24]   S. Fallah, A. Khodaii, Reinforcing overlay to reduce reflection cracking; an experimental investigation, Geotext. Geomembranes. 43 (2015) 216–227.
[25]   M.-L. Nguyen, J. Blanc, J.-P. Kerzrého, P. Hornych, Review of glass fibre grid use for pavement reinforcement and APT experiments at IFSTTAR, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 14 (2013) 287–308.
[26]   D. Zamora-Barraza, M.A. Calzada-Pérez, D. Castro-Fresno, A. Vega-Zamanillo, Evaluation of anti-reflective cracking systems using geosynthetics in the interlayer zone, Geotext. Geomembranes. 29 (2011) 130–136.
[27]   G. Shafabakhsh, S. Asadi, Investigating the effect of AC overlays reinforced with geogrid and modified by sasobit on rehabilitation of reflective cracking, J. Rehabil. Civ. Eng. 8 (2020) 133–148.
[28]   O.M. Ogundipe, N. Thom, A. Collop, Investigation of crack resistance potential of stress absorbing membrane interlayers (SAMIs) under traffic loading, Constr. Build. Mater. 38 (2013) 658–666.
[29]   D.C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, John wiley & sons, 2017.
[30]   A. Dean, D. Voss, D. Draguljić, Response surface methodology, in: Des. Anal. Exp., Springer, 2017: pp. 565–614.
[31]   M.Y. Can, Y. Kaya, O.F. Algur, Response surface optimization of the removal of nickel from aqueous solution by cone biomass of Pinus sylvestris, Bioresour. Technol. 97 (2006) 1761–1765.
[32]   A.I. Khuri, S. Mukhopadhyay, Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2 (2010) 128–149.
[33]   A.C. Atkinson, A.N. Donev, Optimum experimental designs, Clarendon Press, 1992.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 June 2022
  • Revise Date: 22 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 06 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics